Home
Repositories
- The Registry of Methods and Tools for Evidence-Informed Decision Making
- Methods and Tools for Organizational Change
- Health Evidence™
- Repository of Public Health Evidence Syntheses
Training
- Videos
- Evidence-Informed Decision-Making Competence Measure
- Learning Needs Assessment for Evidence-Informed Decision Making
- Online Learning Modules
- University-Certified Learning Module Program
- Webinars
- Workshops
- Knowledge Broker Mentoring Program
- Knowledge Broker Virtual Office Hours
Tools
- Evidence-Informed Decision Making in Public Health
- 6S Search Pyramid
- Anatomy of a Systematic Review
- Rapid Review Guidebook
- EvSyS: The Evidence Synthesis Selection Tool for Decision Makers
- Algorithm for Classifying the Study Design of Primary Studies
- Quality Assessment of Community Evidence (QACE) Tools
- Resource Planning and Assessment (RPA) Tool
- Assessing Applicability and Transferability of Evidence Tool (A&T Tool)
- Core Competency Tool
- Mental Health Resources for Healthcare Workers
Rapid Evidence Service
Impact
- Evidence-Informed Decision Making Casebook
- Impact of the Knowledge Broker Mentoring Program
- Why It Matters
- NCCMT Publications
- User Stories
- Outreach
- KT Student Awards
About Us
- About the NCCMT
- Our Funder
- Our Host Institution
- The National Collaborating Centres
- Team Members
- Advisory Group Members
- Students
- COVID-19 Evidence Network to support Decision-making (COVID-END)
- Contact Us
Access My Dashboard

- Home
- Repositories
  - The Registry of Methods and Tools for Evidence-Informed Decision Making
  - Methods and Tools for Organizational Change
  - Health Evidence™
  - Repository of Public Health Evidence Syntheses
- Training
  - Videos
  - Evidence-Informed Decision-Making Competence Measure
  - Learning Needs Assessment for Evidence-Informed Decision Making
  - Online Learning Modules
  - University-Certified Learning Module Program
  - Webinars
  - Workshops
  - Knowledge Broker Mentoring Program
    
    KB Mentoring Impact
  - Knowledge Broker Virtual Office Hours
- Tools
  - Evidence-Informed Decision Making in Public Health
  - 6S Search Pyramid
  - Anatomy of a Systematic Review
  - Rapid Review Guidebook
  - EvSyS: The Evidence Synthesis Selection Tool for Decision Makers
  - Algorithm for Classifying the Study Design of Primary Studies
  - Quality Assessment of Community Evidence (QACE) Tools
  - Resource Planning and Assessment (RPA) Tool
  - Assessing Applicability and Transferability of Evidence Tool (A&T Tool)
  - Core Competency Tool
  - Mental Health Resources for Healthcare Workers
- Rapid Evidence Service
- Impact
  - Evidence-Informed Decision Making Casebook
  - Impact of the Knowledge Broker Mentoring Program
  - Why It Matters
  - NCCMT Publications
  - User Stories
  - Outreach
  - KT Student Awards
- About Us
  - About the NCCMT
  - Our Funder
  - Our Host Institution
  - The National Collaborating Centres
  - Team Members
  - Advisory Group Members
  - Students
  - COVID-19 Evidence Network to support Decision-making (COVID-END)
  - Contact Us

A Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Systematic Reviews (ROBIS)

University of Bristol (2016). Tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews. Retrieved from Organization website: www.robis-tool.info

Template available

Evaluated/validated

Description

This tool is designed to critically assess the risk of bias in systematic reviews. ROBIS is unique in that it is specifically designed to assess risk of bias, whereas other tools focus on broad goals such as critical appraisal and quality assessment.

Steps for Using Method/Tool

The tool guides users through three phases:

Assess relevance (optional).
Identify concerns with the review process.
Judge the risk of bias.

Validity

Bühn, S., Mathes, T., Prengel, P., Wegewitz, U., Ostermann, T., Robens, S., & Pieper, D. (2017). The risk of bias in systematic reviews tool showed fair reliability and good construct validity. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 91, 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.019

Reliability

Bühn, S., Mathes, T., Prengel, P., Wegewitz, U., Ostermann, T., Robens, S., & Pieper, D. (2017). The risk of bias in systematic reviews tool showed fair reliability and good construct validity. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 91, 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.019

These summaries are written by the NCCMT to condense and to provide an overview of the resources listed in the Registry of Methods and Tools and to give suggestions for their use in a public health context. For more information on individual methods and tools included in the review, please consult the authors/developers of the original resources.

We have provided the resources and links as a convenience and for informational purposes only; they do not constitute an endorsement or an approval by McMaster University of any of the products, services or opinions of the external organizations, nor have the external organizations endorsed their resources and links as provided by McMaster University. McMaster University bears no responsibility for the accuracy, legality or content of the external sites.