Expediting Systematic Reviews: Methods and Implications of Rapid Reviews

Ganann, R., Ciliska, D., & Thomas, H. (2010). Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews. Implementation Science, 5 (56), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-56

Canadian Journal article

Description

This comprehensive appraisal of review strategies for conducting rapid reviews provides important recommendations for using rapid reviews to support evidence-informed decision making.

Steps for Using Method/Tool

The review provides the following recommendations:

  • Use rapid reviews to answer certain types of questions, but be aware that they cannot replace systematic reviews.
  • Consider rapid reviews as interim guidance until a systematic review can be conducted.
  • Increase transparency in the methods used in conducting rapid reviews.
  • Consider the content area and potential for bias when streamlining the review process.
  • Consult with experts throughout the rapid review process.

These summaries are written by the NCCMT to condense and to provide an overview of the resources listed in the Registry of Methods and Tools and to give suggestions for their use in a public health context. For more information on individual methods and tools included in the review, please consult the authors/developers of the original resources.

We have provided the resources and links as a convenience and for informational purposes only; they do not constitute an endorsement or an approval by McMaster University of any of the products, services or opinions of the external organizations, nor have the external organizations endorsed their resources and links as provided by McMaster University. McMaster University bears no responsibility for the accuracy, legality or content of the external sites.

Have you used this resource? Share your story!